Stalemate? The US Dollar Caught in a Tug of War

Former Federal Open Market Committee Chairman Alan Greenspan famously observed that forecasting foreign exchange was like flipping a coin. Last year proved him right. What happened, and what lessons can it teach us about the dollar in 2026?

Like most forecasters, we came into 2025 believing that the economic impact of tariffs would support the US dollar. And yet, in the first few months of last year, the dollar slid by roughly 10%. Then, just when the market adjusted to the likelihood of further dollar weakness, the currency instead stabilized and even regained some ground.

One reason that predicting an exchange rate is complicated is that there are both structural and cyclical variables at play. Structural variables tend to play out over a very long time, while cyclical variables tend to work faster. We believe that there are good structural reasons for the dollar to weaken and that those variables were the primary reason the dollar slid in early 2025. But cyclical variables that pointed—and continue to point—in the other direction boosted the dollar as the year progressed.

We expect more of the same in 2026: a push and pull between the long term and the short term leaves us expecting more volatility than directionality. We expect the dollar will bounce around, but we don’t have high conviction that it will durably move in one direction or the other.

Crosscurrents Keeping the Dollar in Check

From a structural perspective, there are two primary factors that require consideration. The first is valuation. The dollar’s real effective exchange rate, which measures its purchasing power relative to other currencies, is well above its long-term average (Display). This rate tends to mean revert over long periods, suggesting that we should expect the dollar to weaken.

The second structural force—and the mechanism for valuation-driven weakening—is reserve diversification. Central banks and sovereign wealth funds around the world hold a disproportionate share of their assets—nearly 60%—in dollars (Display). That share has gradually declined over time.

Still, given the US’s less reliable, less predictable and less rules-based role in the global political economy, we believe that global reserve managers have an even stronger incentive than they had previously to diversify their holdings. Indeed, the data suggest that outflows accelerated somewhat last year in the wake of the magnitude and breadth of the tariffs announced in April.