Fed's Rigidity Risks Recession as Tariffs Start to Bite

The surprisingly large reduction in mutual tariffs between China and the U.S. announced early Monday morning has sent the markets flying. Trump has softened his approach dramatically and markets are expecting future deals. The base case: everyone at 10%, China at say 20% is still a jump, but at least will likely prevent a recession. Trade and tariffs remain the main focus for markets.

The Fed meeting came and went largely as expected. Those hoping for clarity on a path for rates cuts only received confirmation Jerome Powell remains hesitant to act. This reluctance stands in contrast to a growing list of warning signs: deteriorating supply chains and uncertainty with an unresolved tariff standoff. While Powell acknowledged elevated uncertainty, his refusal to shift policy reveals a broader problem: the Fed’s rigid operational framework has locked it into a reactive stance.

I’ve long argued monetary policy in an ample reserves regime requires far more flexibility than the Fed currently employs. Historically, the Fed Funds Rate moved quickly and frequently in response to evolving conditions. Now, every basis point move is scrutinized like a moon landing, and any change is viewed as the beginning of an irreversible trend. This lack of tactical flexibility constrains the Fed’s ability to mitigate shocks and contributes to policy inertia.

The tariffs themselves are a wildcard. Firms will eventually adjust to whatever tariff level prevails, but there’s a natural lag. Powell dismissed the early warning signs as absent from “real data,” a dangerous reading given the long and variable lags of monetary policy. By the time job losses materialize, it becomes too late to counteract the downturn optimally.