The Shareholders’ Cut

Markets & Investing

What dividends communicate to the most important people in the conversation.

Investors are needy. Insatiable, really.

But it makes sense: If an investor buys a share of a company, they’re going to want some benefit from it. And under the Friedman doctrine – the most influential model for business ethics since the 1970s – a company’s leaders are seen to have a moral responsibility to address that insatiable need, to provide “shareholder value.”

They do this in one of two ways: Grow the price of the stock or pay dividends to shareholders.

Growth gets all the good headlines, being about imagination, the future and newness.

Dividends, on the other hand, don’t have that flair. Dividends are more about sustainable profitability – about what is and what has been. Even the index exclusive to large US companies that have reliably increased dividends for at least 25 years has a stodgy name: the S&P Dividend Aristocrats.

But growth stories sometimes falter and dividend checks (almost) always cash. So as investors with needs, maybe it’s time we refamiliarize ourselves with our steady friend, the dividend.