Do Emerging Markets Need Developed Markets?

A world in transition

Much has changed in the world economy. Globalization, “the Washington consensus,” “the end of history” and long supply chains are bygones.1 Deglobalization, tariffs, populism, anti-immigration and regional conflict represent the present.

Globalization accelerated after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, benefiting emerging economies, especially China and India. The expansion of trade, capital, services and labor flows boosted emerging economies from the early 1990s until recent times. For China and India, significant domestic reforms unleashed in the 1980s and 1990s abetted their rapid ascent onto the global stage.

But with globalization now stumbling, how will the emerging complex fare? Can emerging economies pivot away from goods exports and services outsourcing—activities at risk from de-globalization? How will they cope with lower levels of foreign investment? Can they find alternative sources of growth and profitability? Will their societies deliver sufficient innovation from within?

In short, can emerging markets (EMs) succeed where success factors must increasingly be homegrown?

For decades, emerging economies have relied on developed economies for access to capital and technology, while providing cheap land and labor. Foreign direct investments were incentivized through better returns from cheaper production in EMs, from which goods and services were exported to developed countries. This led to the establishment of long, cheap supply chains from countries such as China to the United States, Europe and Japan.

As tariffs, artificial intelligence and other trade barriers challenge these modes of production and distribution, emerging economies need to pivot. They must reorient trade with one another and rely on domestic drivers for their future growth.