Value Investing’s Quiet Comeback

Revisiting Value

It’s become something of a parlor joke in certain circles to ask: “Is value investing dead?” After this week, a better question might be, “Has the death of value been greatly exaggerated?” (with a hat tip to Mark Twain).

Since the global financial crisis, value investing has been a lonely grind. Yet I know several managers who never gave up on value, and others who are uncomfortable with tech valuations and have been reallocating to lower P/E stocks. Now we have the talking heads of traditional financial media shouting, “Value is making a comeback!”

It’s worth asking: What happened to value over the past decade? Why could now be different? And where should we focus if we want to capitalize on a changing market?

A Rough Decade for Value

Value investing—buying shares seemingly undervalued by the market—once seemed unassailable. Legendary investors like Warren Buffett never deviated from their value bend. Yet, for nearly 30 years and especially since 2008, value has underperformed growth stocks, barring a brief post-dotcom resurgence. Why?

First, several sectors known for value, like banking, retail, insurance, and utilities, generated low returns and had weak balance sheets following the financial crisis. These companies couldn’t produce the rates of profit growth you’d see in technology. They lacked the means to invest in R&D, brand-building, and tech upgrades, making it hard to break their low-valuation cycle. They became “value traps.”

Second, the mean reversion that value investors expect from seemingly cheap stocks didn’t happen, or it took a lot longer than expected. Cheap stocks stayed cheap.

Indexing played a role. As ETFs and index investing grow, more capital is passively allocated to the big, expensive stocks that dominate today’s market. Reuters recently reported that nearly 60% of the US stock market is held in passive funds.

Don’t forget rates—big growth companies feasted on low interest rates, furthering their advantage in the markets.