Model Portfolios May Help Advisors Avoid Costly Fixed Income Timing Traps

We believe a disciplined approach to bond investing is critical to achieving desired return and risk objectives. Model portfolios may help.

SUMMARY

  • Lower starting yields and the potential for renewed volatility make fixed income portfolio construction particularly challenging today.
  • Investors have a tendency to fall into “timing traps,” including selling core bond allocations after rates have risen or selling credit allocations after spreads widen – even though that is often when future return prospects are brightening and may be an advantageous time to buy.
  • PIMCO’s fixed income model portfolios may help financial advisors position their client portfolios for the road ahead through a disciplined approach that emphasizes forward-looking return potential when allocating across fixed income sectors.

“Buy the dips” is a refrain often heard after equity market sell-offs. The logic is sound: If your outlook hasn’t changed and equities suddenly become cheaper, it may make sense to consider adding to your allocation. However, we don’t often hear a similar response in fixed income markets when yields rise or spreads widen – even though that is often when we find future return prospects are brightening and it may be an advantageous time to buy. In reality, the reaction is typically quite the opposite: We often see investors selling core bond allocations after rates have risen or selling credit allocations after spreads widen. Model portfolios that emphasize forward-looking return potential when allocating across fixed income sectors may help avoid this tendency.

“Timing traps” are hard to resist, and can potentially have significant implications for returns. Flow data from Morningstar bears this out: Across a variety of fixed income sectors and time periods, the performance of the average fund in a given category beat the average investor’s return, inclusive of flows (see Figure 1). This means investors’ timing decisions cost them on average anywhere from one to three percentage points of returns annualized – a meaningful portion of the total return potential of their fixed income allocations.

Fixed income investor returns lag fund returns

Poor timing decisions may dent returns

Part of the challenge is that investor flows into fixed income typically follow attractive trailing returns, after yields have fallen and spreads have tightened. However, lower yields and tighter spreads have often been indicators of weaker returns to come. For example, the long-term forward returns of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index have been tightly tied to starting yields, regardless of the path of interest rates (see Figure 2). While the 10.17% one-year trailing return on the aggregate index as of 31 August may look quite attractive (as 10-year Treasury yields fell 123 basis points (bps) over the same period), today’s starting yield of 2.13% is likely a much better indicator of long-term future returns, if historical trends hold.

Starting yields have been strongly correlated with forward returns