Income Strategy Update: Active Positioning for a Volatile and Uncertain Environment

Markets have generally been risk-on since Donald Trump’s election as president. Yet tremendous uncertainty remains over future fiscal and monetary policies, and volatility persists at high levels. As Portfolio Managers Dan Ivascyn and Alfred Murata discuss in the following Q&A, PIMCO’s Income Strategy has a “bend-but-not-break” approach that seeks to generate consistent income with a stable net asset value whether growth is stronger or weaker than expected.

Q: How have the elections affected the outlook for markets and economies?

Daniel Ivascyn: The range of potential economic outcomes is complex and both left- and right-tail risks have grown. Pro-growth policies in the U.S., including major infrastructure spending and tax cuts, could support riskier assets. But tougher trade policies could create foreign policy risks, triggering sharp risk-off moves. In addition, Donald Trump’s presidential victory underscores the rise of populism, which has the potential to stoke volatility in 2017.

Moreover, the global economy faces three tricky transitions: a handoff from monetary to fiscal policies in developed markets; a move from globalization to de-globalization, which could create headwinds for productivity and spark inflation; and the evolution of China’s foreign exchange regime toward a managed or even free float.

We believe this environment favors active strategies. Risk management, including maintenance of sufficient liquidity and portfolio flexibility, is critical to navigating markets that will likely be volatile over the coming months.

Q: How have you positioned the portfolio given increased volatility?

Alfred Murata: In our view, the best way to generate consistent income and stable net asset values is to divide the portfolio into two larger components. The first is composed of higher-yielding assets that we expect will perform well if economic growth exceeds expectations. For instance, we have a significant position in non-agency mortgage-backed securities. These are bonds backed by mortgage loans in the U.S. but do not have a government guarantee. They have attractive yields and may be resilient even during slower economic periods.

The second component of the portfolio invests in higher-quality assets that we believe will do well if economic growth disappoints. Among our most attractive investments in this category is Australian interest rate duration. If there’s a slowdown in Chinese growth, we think commodity prices would weaken, reducing growth and interest rates in Australia.

Q: Alfred, could you talk a bit more about the core holding in non-agency mortgage-backed securities?

Murata: These bonds are backed by mortgage loans in the U.S. but don’t have a guarantee from government agencies such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. As an investor, therefore, you’re dependent on borrowers paying you back. So there are two main performance drivers: home prices and borrower quality.

What the market may not fully appreciate is that these borrowers have been making payments for 10 or more years. Moreover, we’ve been able to buy these bonds at a significant discount to par value, typically around 75-85 cents on the dollar. Our strategy aims to realize about 85-90 cents on the dollar, based on our assumption that housing prices will rise by about 3% annually.